Things of interest

  The whole Pakistan thing just gets worse.  Al Queda’s number 2 called for a holy war against the Musharraf regime.

We really need to pay more attention to this.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070711/ap_on_re_as/pakistan_radical_mosque_190;_ylt=As6fUpke5gO3.QoPFX3LF.8L1vAI

this one really bothers me.  Elephants have enough issues (they’re large, its hard to find nice shoes, mice freak them out) without humans killing them for the hell of it and a little bit of ivory.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070710/sc_afp/kenyatanzaniawildlife_070710162807

  Dear george bush, you frigging maniac.  The Iraqi government has given you a way out, and you appear to dumb to take it.  Take a read of this, and try to get your priorities straight.  Oh wait, you know this.  So if Al Qaeda was the original enemy, and they are as  strong as they were, and are raising hell in afghanistan and pakistan….uhhhh….why not let the Iraqi’s deal with their own political crapfest, and get back on point.  You really look dumb here, bud.

http://www.mail.com/newsarticle.aspx?catId=&articleId=1133989

I only do this one because my readers are mostly to young to remember Jim Morrison.  He was the incredibly talentless, drug addicted leader of The Doors, who chicks thought was hot so they made millions which they then spent on drugs until dipstick here died of an OD.   (MSNBC and I…wasting your time)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19714635/

These stories show up more and more often.  I’m not sure if it’s acase of me paying more attention, man is somehow affecting their habitat, or if McDonalds is about to launch a new weight watchers Calamari sandwich.  (CNN, keeping up with the koneses…and the yahoo’s…and the googles)

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/07/11/big.squid.ap/index.html

  So the John Conyers led fiasco is begun.  Lets pick on the women first.  Women who set no policy, but since we can’t get the fish we want, lets threaten these former employees with contempt of congress.  Which is funny, because if theire is any group of people in America thats worth being contemptuous toward, it’s these analbrains.  It is just more you did it so we’re going to do it.  Every time there is a power shift we do this instead of moving forward. (Fox wasting your time, congress wasting your money, and me wasting my breath)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,289003,00.html

the “Well That Was Dumb, but it’s Still Trivial” award goes here.  I don’t want to laugh, but holy jumpin jesus gonzales perez christo this was dumb

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288918,00.html

10 years ago

this is a weak at best tag from  MAX.  In order that you may avoid this, if you read this post you are tagged.  If you leave now you are stoopid…it could be good.

What were you doing 10 years ago?

I was Managing a rubber dick store.

What were you doing 1 year ago?

Painting bridges for the Monon Trail  Barbie pink.

Five Songs That You Know All The Lyrics To.

1. Jinglebells.

2. Henry the 8th by herman and the hermits.

3. the star spangled banner by francis Scott Key

4. The 1812 overture by Pyotr Ilych Tchaikovsky

5. Roll Me Away by Bob Seger

Five Things You Would Do If You Were a Millionaire.

1. Buy Roscoe a woman

2. Go on an unsane Victoria’s Secret models buying spree. Could anything be more fun for me than buying every model in the catalog? Could anything be more fun for the sales person? Love fest!

3. Tell my kids they can’t have any of it just to see the expressions on their faces.

4. get some new 501’s, and a maid to wash them.

5.   go to work…a million will be gone after the first Victoria’s Secret model I’m thinking

 5 Bad Habits

I have no bad habits…my heart is pure

Five Things You Like To Do.

1. name redacted

2. name redacted

3. name redacted

4. name redacted

5. sleep

Five Things You Would Never Wear Again.

1. a Blast hood.

 2. fatigues

3. tafetta.  (nope…it’s none of your business.)

4. boxers with scooby doo or rudolph  on them.  

5.  an inmate number.

5 favorite toys

1. Blonde

2. Brunette

3. Redhead

4.  sheep

5. pauliacs

---

tis done

The Ron Pauliacs revenge

   Boy, I’ll never point out another chink in the armor of the American messiah again.  Was I ever laid waste.  They smote me from the left, and then they smited me from the left, and then I was even smitten by…wait.  thats a different post.  The Pauliacs reared there verbose heads at my challenge to explain the NAFTA Superhighway flip flop.  They were in full glory as the pointed out the following

 “he voted against his earmarks in the final bill”

“doesn’t I-69 already exist in Texas”

ouch.  Those hurt.  Bad.  Most of them failed to get past the first link because it was probably obvious that their fair haired boy had done an oopsie on this one.

    It’s ok though.  With the exception of a rare minority, they can’t accept that he can be wrong too.  They didn’t want to accept that he voted public funds to subsidize offshore oil exploration.  They didn’t want to accept that he votes both ways on abortion.  They didn’t want to accept that he tries to subsidize the shrimp industry, and that he uses earmarks to purchase votes.  They’d rather say something incredibly bright like “so does the other guy.”

Can we say NAFTA flip flop to gain support from rich Texans boys and girls?

   Let’s go with I’m right, you all are wrong on this one.

I killed A millwright today

  I wasn’t going to do it, but the opportunity presented itself.  He was standing on the catwalk over kettle 8, talking to me over his shoulder.

he is a whiner, and a snitch, and a wiseass, and it suddenly occurred to me that one little shove….

he barely squeaked as he hit 8000 gallons of molten lead and disappeared.

I would have stayed and admired my handywork, but it was lunchtime, and I had lasagna.

The afternoon was beautiful.  Sun shining, a light breeze, and no whining.

6 a. m. hateful

I have an eye swollen shut, I tripped on the gotdam dog, stubbed my toe on the bathrooom door which some idiot hung to swing outward, and I am for damn sure drinking breakfast.

oh, it’s raining.  I want to know which of you is responsible for that?

Ron Paul and the NAFTA Super Highway (with corrected links)

I apologize for the links.  They’ve been fixed

  As many of you know, I’m neither for nor against any political candidate at this point.  That being said I have shown more interest in Ron Paul than in many of the other candidates.  The reason for this is I believe Ron Paul is more dangerous.

   One of his bloggers the other day (name withheld) challenged me to come up with something they haven’t already figured out how to spin.  So here you go.  Explain this for me.

On October 30, 2006 He said this: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst103006.htm

what this article does not say is the NAFTA superhighway IS I-69. 

On march 12, 2007, Ron Paul made a request for funds.  It was for I-69, and was categorized as funding for roads. see this link.  (page 20)

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/allpolitics/0706/popup.congress.earmarks/pdfs/tx.14.paul.pdf 

Now, if he was against it in october, why is he trying to appropriate funds for it in march?  Don’t say “well he voted against it in the final bill.”  Just tell me why he tried to appropriate funds for the NAFTA superhighway.

  There you go ron paul bloggers.  Handle that… BTW, I am really curious about this, so if any of you have information let me know.  The NAFTA superhighway will go through my town, and I don’t like it.  China is funding deep water ports in mexico, which will make them the big winner in the whole deal.

thanks mike for bringing this to my attention