Boy, I’ll never point out another chink in the armor of the American messiah again. Was I ever laid waste. They smote me from the left, and then they smited me from the left, and then I was even smitten by…wait. thats a different post. The Pauliacs reared there verbose heads at my challenge to explain the NAFTA Superhighway flip flop. They were in full glory as the pointed out the following
“he voted against his earmarks in the final bill”
“doesn’t I-69 already exist in Texas”
ouch. Those hurt. Bad. Most of them failed to get past the first link because it was probably obvious that their fair haired boy had done an oopsie on this one.
It’s ok though. With the exception of a rare minority, they can’t accept that he can be wrong too. They didn’t want to accept that he voted public funds to subsidize offshore oil exploration. They didn’t want to accept that he votes both ways on abortion. They didn’t want to accept that he tries to subsidize the shrimp industry, and that he uses earmarks to purchase votes. They’d rather say something incredibly bright like “so does the other guy.”
Can we say NAFTA flip flop to gain support from rich Texans boys and girls?
Let’s go with I’m right, you all are wrong on this one.